More Pages: Atlanta Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19


A good narrative of Sherman's march to the sea

Magical story of a young Irish man's dreams of happiness.

Funny Atlanta tidbits

War So TerribleAs a layman, I was not bogged down with too much military lingo, and was able to get a good grasp of the strategy used on both sides. Maps and pictures add to the clarity. The authors seemed to start out being favorably disposed to Joseph E. Johnston's command, then, as they analyze all the historical and geographical factors from hindsight, they bring the reader to wonder at his failure to maneuver into a decisive victory over Sherman's advancing army. With the ensuing command of Gen. Hood one senses the nearly frantic contrast to throw men into battle as Atlanta becomes ever-more threatened, at great sacrifice of Confederate lives.
If you had ancestors that fought in the Atlanta Campaign, this is a very good book, with details drawn from numerous sources. The writers have added soldiers' and officers' comments from diaries and letters that detail the morale, the terrain, the weather, and attitude towards the events of the day. These add more interest to the sometimes dry, official commentaries so often quoted in other works.
Good history for layman or scholar; Union or Confederate.


If you only have one choice then choose ZagatI have used Zagat Surveys for years and have found them to be up to date and reliable in their critical evaluation of a restaurant's food, ambiance and service. Scoring 1-30 in each category (food, decor, service) a restaurant's top score in each category can be 30. The Ritz-Carlton Dining Room, Buckhead scored 28, 27, 27 . . . the highest score in Atlanta. The remaining 449 restaurants in this guide have a flagship to follow. One of the most useful features is the guide's "Top Rating" sections: Top Food by Cuisine, Best Buys, Most Popular, Top Outdoor, Top Romantic, Top Views etc.
This is a very good pocket guide and if there is a downside it is the lack of maps. Two small maps are what you get to cover 450 restaurants, actually these two maps only list the 40 most popular restaurants. Another area that may disappoint some is the terse 50 word description for each restaurant, a brief narrative that fails to mention any outstanding restaurant dishes. If you are looking for a fuller restaurant description, I commend the "Atlanta Restaurant Guide" by Christiane Lauterbach. Though dated (1996) it is a good guide to also have (both are guides used together would be best). Zagat has been, and is, the best overall dining guide for Atlanta. Recommended!


This is a very good restaurant pocket guide.The 2002/03 edition has 95% of the best restaurants in Atlanta (when compared against the culture Atlanta magazine "Jezebel" in their July '100 Best Restaurants of 2002' edition). Scoring 1-30 in each category (food, decor, service) a restaurant's top score in each category can be 30. The Ritz-Carlton Dining Room, Buckhead scored 28, 27, 28 . . . the highest score in Atlanta. The remaining 449 restaurants in this guide have a flagship to follow.
One of the most useful features is the guide's "Top Rating" sections: Top Food by Cuisine, Best Buys, Most Popular, Top Outdoor, Top Romantic, Top Views, etc.
This is a very good pocket guide and, if there is a downside, it is the lack of maps. Two small maps are what you get to cover 450 restaurants. Actually, these two maps only list the 42 most popular restaurants. Another area that may disappoint some is the terse 50 word description for each restaurant, a brief narrative that fails to mention any outstanding restaurant dishes.
If you are looking for a fuller restaurant description, I commend the "Atlanta Restaurant Guide" by Christiane Lauterbach. Though dated (1996), it is a good guide to also have, but both are guides used together would be best. Zagat has been, and is, the best overall dining guide for Atlanta. Recommended!


This book is unintentionally hilarious. . .
A most engaging book on how to achieve the "look".
Just delicious!

my reviewI enjoyed reading this novel, not only because I was familiar with most of the places described in the book, but also because I liked very much the style the author uses to describe the characters, their emotions.
Suffice to say, I was totally "hooked" and I have read almost all of her books.
Wonderful
The best of ARS I've read so far

An exceptional characterization of late 20th century AmericaWhile I, too, was unsatisfied with the anticlimatic ending, the "spark of Zeus" nevertheless prevailed throughout this classic.
A Book In Full
Tom Wolfe's Books Buzz with EnergyI am keenly aware when I read Wolfe that I am not reading literature. This is sheer indulgence! This is a soap opera. Finely and skillfully wrought, no doubt, but still a social circus of over bred egos and under bred moral sense. 'A Man in Full's' characters are brought to the material abyss through pride, lust, avarice and envy. These are surface dwellers, arrivistes without an appreciation of proportion and self restraint. They seek nothing deeper or more meaningful in their lives than an escalation up another rung on the social ladder. It's hard to like most of these people but dramatic personalities of this type are not made to be likable. It can still be a little overwrought at times. There is no stasis in Tom Wolfe's work, no get along and go along. All the protagonists are gladiators in the forum, everyone has an agenda, which leads to raucous, hilarious and even heroic results when put in the context of an elegant gallery benefit, a thoroughbred stud session, or a violent prison pod.
The sustaining philosophical undercurrent here is the Stoic creed of Epictetus. It is a philosophy of resolve and assertion of self dignity in the face of persecution, humiliation and defeat. It is the actualisation of this essential man which Wolfe uses as a contrast to the material and social accouterments by which Charles Croker and company have defined themselves. The episode of palpable terror and self affirmation in the prison pod is as powerful as anything written in contemporary fiction
If there is a problem with this book, it's that it's finely honed characters and situations and it's excellent writing are thread together by a somewhat tenuous and implausible story line. Sometimes it seems as though Wolfe threw it together as an afterthought to frame his comic, social and character essays, of which he is the modern master. I wrestled with giving it four stars on this basis, but the compensating strengths are too compelling.
I'm not sure quite what to make of the ending. As usual Wolfe ties up all the loose ends in an epilogue which can leave you wondering 'what's the point?'. To Wolfe's credit he does not provide happy endings or poetic justice. Charlie Croker and Sherman McCoy are joined at a point when their 'tragic flaws' and superficiality are becoming dimly evident even to themselves. We leave them in the detritus of their unraveled lives. The character's final dissolution is left unresolved. They seem to become aware of an inner self, though, brought to a point where they might even be developing some character. Something only they need understand. The rest of the world goes along merrily as if none of this had happened.
When I finish a book like this I feel like I've been to a feast where I've indulged myself a bit too much. In 100 years Tom Wolfe will be mainly of interest to social historians, as locked as his books are to this day and age. But on the off chance that they are studying Wolfe in lit classes, 'A Man in Full' should regarded as a masterpiece of journalistic fiction.


Not worth the effort
Awesome book!
FANTASTIC!! A MUST READ!